Valérie Plante’s broken promise hands a victory to cynicism

Among these we find a much-needed $28 million boost to public transit (a 5 per cent jump) and measures to improve pedestrian safety, as well as nearly $20 million for diverse housing initiatives and multi-million-dollar increases to the budgets for arts and culture, snow removal, and the frontline services provided by the boroughs.

The renewed investments will come with a price. Residents will see their taxes increased by an average of 3.3 per cent, which represents an additional $118 a year for an average homeowner in Montreal and far less for the majority of Montrealers who rent.

Fixing the pipes

The hike is due chiefly to the increase in the water tax, which has been frozen since 2013 despite massive investments in the city’s aging water infrastructure that will have ballooned from $93 million in 2014 to $500 million in 2018.

A campaign platform is a party’s contract with citizens, a solemn set of commitments and values on which a government’s performance can be measured and held to account.

Plante has argued that the increase to the water tax is necessary and that the investments are the responsible thing to do given the catastrophic state of our water infrastructure. It is estimated that Montreal loses a third of its drinking water every year due to leaky pipes, and it costs ten times more to repair the 850 water mains that rupture each year than to plan the works in advance.

The decisions made are thus highly justifiable. If the story of the Plante budget stopped here, Montrealers might have woken up on Thursday to an entirely different narrative plastered across the headlines.

Legitimate criticism

Instead, the budget has been met with unanimous denunciations of her “broken promise” — and understandably so. Plante’s tax increase violated the express commitment made in Projet Montréal’s campaign platform to “fulfill its program without increasing taxes beyond inflation,” then pegged at 2.1 per cent for 2018.

This is no minor thing. A campaign platform is a party’s contract with citizens, a solemn set of commitments and values on which a government’s performance can be measured and held to account.

It has been doubly disappointing, therefore, to see the mayor trying to rewrite her platform post-election by insisting that her pledge referred only to the 1.9 per cent increase to the property tax. In repeatedly denying the evident truth of a broken promise, Valérie Plante guaranteed that the tax increase would overshadow the rest of the budget.

Plante’s inability to level with voters sabotaged any hopes that they would let this reversal pass

It can be argued that the corner the Plante administration found themselves in was not entirely of their own making. Projet Montréal claims to have been left a surprise $358 million budgetary shortfall by the preceding administration, which is possible only because opposition parties in Montreal lack access to the books that would allow them to make fully informed decisions regarding their platforms. Plante, to her credit, has agreed to put an end to this situation by tasking the city’s auditor general with publishing the state of the city’s finances prior to each election.

It can become necessary and even responsible at times for politicians to go back on a commitment if new information or circumstances come to light. Citizens are mature enough to accept this when it’s justified. But the condition is that their leaders are transparent and upfront with them, and that they respect citizens’ intelligence and democratic rights enough to acknowledge the broken promise, explain fully, and gain their support.

Plante’s inability to level with voters sabotaged any hopes that they would let this reversal pass, and comes as a particularly bitter pill to swallow for Montrealers who expected more from this mayor.

Missing the point

Some Plante supporters have cried foul over the media’s obsessive focus on the tax increase, and have tried to argue the many merits of the budget as a whole.

But this is to miss the point of the present uproar. Politicians’ actions, whether we support them or not, are built on the foundation of trust between citizens and representatives. The edifice of representative democracy crumbles if politicians are allowed to make easy promises to win votes, jettison them when the going gets rough, and then claim that a broken promise is not a broken promise — and it is precisely the media’s role to push back hard against those who attempt to do just that.

Valerie Plante’s failure to own up to a broken promise has fuelled the ambient cynicism that is eating away at these democratic foundations.

Today, every voice that says “Nothing ever changes” and “They’re all the same” is emboldened. And it just got a little harder to argue that they’re wrong.

/by

Projet Montréal era an opportunity to democratize the city

Projet Montréal’s rise to power represents only the second time in Montreal’s history that a citizens’ party, one controlled from the bottom up, has gained control of City Hall. But now comes the hard part. How do we channel this victory into lasting reforms, so that this window of opportunity opens onto a new democratic era for Montreal, and not another layer of cynicism heaped onto the wreckage?

We’ve seen it happen before: a party of outsiders and idealists rises to office on bold promises of change, and once in power, slowly but surely find themselves overwhelmed by the system they vowed to transform, centralizing power and becoming disconnected from their base and the wider citizenry.

The fundamental challenge for the new administration now is: How can we build structures that will keep the channels open and flowing from the grassroots to the corridors of power? How can we propel a culture shift that empowers citizens in a lasting way and inspires them to take an active part in building their city?

The challenge is one of scale. For behind the “pink” wave of November 5th, we can easily forget that only 42 per cent of the electorate turned out to vote in the closest and most transformative election in our city’s recent history.

The rise of Projet Montréal presents us with a vital opportunity to revive and reinvent local democracy for the 21st century, and to join the rank of cities around the world who are carving out space for a new citizen-powered politics built on the principles of participation, solidarity and inclusion.

Montreal’s engine of democratization

Fortunately, the seed of such a transformation already exists. Unique in the municipal world, the Office of Public Consultation (officially the Office de consultation publique de Montréal or OCPM) is the model of an independent, impartial, and effective arbiter of public opinion and expertise whose innovative pursuit of participatory practices is recognized around the world.

When decisions pass through the OCPM’s filter, all stakeholders, including citizens, experts, civil society organizations, and developers, are heard on an equal footing. The thorough and thoughtful recommendations that result provide the strongest assurance of a development that serves the common and long-term interests.

When the OCPM is circumvented or ignored, we get frenetic urban development in Griffintown, the razing of 1,000 trees on Île Sainte-Hélène, an ongoing housing crisis, inadequate public transit, and a city built according to the narrow views and interests of politicians and private developers.

Unfortunately, consulting the public through the OCPM isn’t required for the vast majority of projects that reshape our neighbourhoods and daily lives. Under the City Charter, consultations are only triggered by modifications to the urban master plan that are initiated by City Council, but not by the boroughs.

The roots of a participatory city are laid, but they need nurturing to grow. By pursuing bold reforms aimed at strengthening the OCPM’s mandate and expanding its role in our public life, the Plante administration could make good on its vow to deepen the culture of public consultation in Montreal, and evolve it into a culture of active participation.

Harnessing the collective intelligence

In Montreal, public consultations have historically been treated as a parallel process to our representative structures, rather than their foundation. They have too often served as an after-the-fact embellishment of well-advanced plans, when not a public relations move meant to lend a false sense of legitimacy for predetermined decisions.

This approach not only makes citizen-initiated modifications to plans more expensive, more superficial, and less likely to occur. By not beginning with the citizens, we send the message that their ideas are not welcome, thereby repelling engagement and placing citizens in an oppositional stance while depriving ourselves of the intelligence and expertise of people and organizations working at the grassroots level.

In a participatory city, all city and neighbourhood plans are co-designed from the bottom up, and the collective intelligence of communities are drawn upon both to devise new initiatives and to filter projects proposed by promoters or politicians in the interim.

If the Plante administration is committed to building such a city, they will lobby the provincial government to have these principles entrenched in the City Charter. This is the only way to guarantee that public consultations are held systematically at all stages of the urban planning process and for all major projects, both at the city level and in the boroughs.

The new democracy is in cities

While the OCPM has been hobbled by its limited budget and mandate, the experiences of other cities demonstrate what could be achieved by providing it with the tools it needs to pilot the next phase of Montreal’s democratization.

In Barcelona, the city launched an open-source deliberative platform, Decidim Barcelona, that invited citizens to co-create municipal and district action plans. The platform attracted 25,000 registered users and 10,000 proposals that helped to form the basis of an ambitious agenda.

Mexico City partnered with Change.org and social media platforms to partially crowdsource the city’s first constitution.

Seoul’s municipal government pioneered a mobile voting app that allows citizens to submit and vote on local policy proposals. At least 181 of these citizen proposals had made it into law as of September 2017.

Joining the urban avant-garde

In the OCPM, Montreal already has an institution with the legitimacy and capacity to pilot such projects, and a 15-year track record of developing new tools and processes for expanding participation.

Montreal is ready to join the rank of democratic reformers. All we’re missing is the political will.

As part of its citizen-initiated consultation on reducing Montreal’s dependence on fossil fuels, the OCPM hosted its first ever online deliberative platform, which allowed citizens to submit and vote on proposals while providing supporting arguments and references. The experiment in e-democracy attracted 5,600 participants and was wildly popular among its users, offering a hint of Montrealers’ desire for meaningful ways to impact city policy.

Montreal is ready to join the rank of democratic reformers. All we’re missing is the political will. With a massive expansion of its budget, mandate and presence, the OCPM can become the backbone of a new citizen-powered politics: their platform that’s independent from party establishments and that brings our democracy to life through daily deliberations between citizens.

Moving from consultation to collaboration

To combat cynicism and promote involvement, citizens need to know that their ideas will have a real impact. We must transition towards a truly participatory paradigm where citizen involvement is channelled upward into policy rather than resounding through a parallel echo chamber.

Beyond the mayor’s welcome promises of respecting the OCPM’s recommendations, what will her administration do to pursue a more enduring culture shift?

One option would be to propose legislative reforms to ensure that OCPM recommendations get automatically sent to council committees for analysis, with these reports leading to formal responses by the administration that are debated and voted on by City Council. This could be paired with the creation of a new bureau of the OCPM tasked with tracking progress on its recommendations, to help citizens and media hold politicians to account.

Building a participatory city

In her inauguration speech, Plante called on Montrealers to take an active role in building their city. Yet for them to do so, they need to know that it will count.

By adopting the measures outlined above, the new administration would demonstrate a genuine commitment to strengthening citizens’ power, while limiting their own power. And few things revive hope in democracy quite like a politician acting against their own interests, and in favour of yours.

__

A modified version of the above article was originally published on Ricochet. 

/by
© Copyright 2018 - Shawn Katz